At a 2004 conference, he stated, “PSA no longer has a relationship to prostate cancer. You might as well biopsy a man because he has blue eyes.” In fact, the PSA test has been such a dismal failure in detecting prostate cancer, its inventor (Richard J.
Ablin) has been speaking out against his own discovery for more than a gleason 8 prostate cancer prognosis decade! Most recently, in a Gleason 8 prostate cancer prognosis March 2010 edition of The New York Times, Ablin wrote, “The [PSA] test is hardly more effective than a coin toss. As I’ve been trying to make clear for many years now, PSA testing can’t detect prostate cancer…The test’s popularity has gleason 8 prostate cancer prognosis led to a hugely expensive public health disaster.” On a side note, a large body of evidence demonstrates that PSA is not a “prostate-specific” antigen at all.
Gleason 6 prostate cancer treatment
Prostate 4 times normal size
Prostate f
Prostate 2+ size
14.06.2018 - ALLIGATOR |
The perineum (transperineal), which is the. |
14.06.2018 - 0702464347 |
Risk may be increased effective way, while at the same time significantly reducing complications. |
14.06.2018 - KAMILLO |
While, there may be other prostate gland that could. |
No comments:
Post a Comment